花了1000块钱买了个置顶的道具

我是一根葱

原帖由 education2008 于 2007-7-28 16:31 发表


你说对了。嫉恶如仇。因为一个搞研究的人，在社会上立足的唯一价值就是科学这个护身符。
如果大家都信科学，那么，搞研究的人就觉得脸上有光，觉得自己有价值。
可是，如果一个社会没有人信科学，却对伪科 ...

很遗憾偶只能说我们生活在伪科学与造假的年代，偶年轻的时候也是嫉恶如仇的。

适者生存，有时候伪与假更能生存下来。

education2008

原帖由 我是一根葱 于 2007-7-28 16:29 发表


小哥你还是山顶的石头，偶是滚到山脚的石头全没棱角了 。

看来还是要对比，一对比说明偶自己很卑鄙，经常在觉得自己掌握了真理广而告之他人而别人又不听时就产生这样的想法:"让他们XX下去吧。"

其实现实生活中我跟你差不多。棱角全无。可是，在网上可以率真一点，反正也没人知道我是谁，呵呵，委琐。

小猪的铺子

我是一根葱 提到未找到楼主所说的权威认定材料。如果楼主能把此权威认定材料以合适的方式公布在这里，比如详细的网址，文件扫描件，背景材料，得到如此结论所采用的方法，采集的数据和实例，等等，用中国家长可以理解的方式加以列举说明，会有用的多吧。否则随意的一篇文章，能说服谁。讲来讲去，无非空对空而已。

我是一根葱

原帖由 education2008 于 2007-7-28 16:36 发表


其实现实生活中我跟你差不多。棱角全无。可是，在网上可以率真一点，反正也没人知道我是谁，呵呵，委琐。

这就是泥的不对了，现实生活中实现不了的居然天真地想在网上实现？

网上的更假了，你话重一点N个马上与你翻脸了，有时我都觉得要跟天理就是假装着也要跟着天理走才可以讲话大声的，哎全一个样。

我是一根葱

原帖由 小猪的铺子 于 2007-7-28 16:38 发表
我是一根葱 提到未找到楼主所说的权威认定材料。如果楼主能把此权威认定材料以合适的方式公布在这里，比如详细的网址，文件扫描件，背景材料，得到如此结论所采用的方法，采集的数据和实例，等等，用中国家长可 ...

SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR EVALUATING THE DOMAN-DELACATO "PATTERNING" METHOD
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/45/2/302

Herbert J. Cohen M.D.1, Herbert G. Birch M.D.1, and Lawrence T. Taft M.D.1
1 Department of Pediatrics and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York

A method of rehabilitation therapy and development training named "patterning" has been considered. The theories upon which the method is based and the findings which have stemmed from its application have both been analyzed.

It has been concluded that the data thus far advanced are insufficient to justify affirmative conclusions about the system of treatment. Consideration of the statistics of individual case reports suggest that the changes obtained may reflect normal growth and development occurring independently of the method applied, or the inadvertent consequence of social stimulation and environmental change inherent in, or resulting from, the application of almost any method. We have also noted evidence that is available that justifies questioning the theoretical premises of the method.

The problem of selecting optimal therapy for patients with brain damage and cerebral dysfunction is complicated by the finding that sensory and motor function are not affected in a uniform and consistent manner by damage to the central nervous system. Lack of understanding of the fundamental mechanisms which integrate sensory and motor activities continues to make the selection of a therapy most difficult. Until we gain a greater understanding of sensory and motor integrative mechanisms, scientific (statistically corroborated) proof is needed before "patterning" or any other method may claim sufficient universal applicability to serve as the sole therapeutic approach to one or more disturbances of intellectual and motor function.

Submitted on May 30, 1969
Accepted on October 1, 1969

我不是会员,无法取得PDF整体资料,这些是游民可得的资料extract.

[ 本帖最后由 我是一根葱 于 2007-7-28 16:55 编辑 ]

我是一根葱

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/70/5/810

PEDIATRICS Vol. 70 No. 5 November 1982, pp. 810-812

The Doman-Delacato Treatment of Neurologically Handicapped Children

The Doman-Delacato Treatment of Neurologically Handicapped Children The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential differ substantially from other groups treating developmental problems in (1) the excessive nature of their poorly documented claims for cure and (2) the major demands placed on parents in unswervingly carrying out an unproven technique to the smallest detail.

In most instances, improvement observed in patients undergoing this method of treatment can be accounted for on the basis of growth and development, the intensive practice of certain isolated skills, or the nonspecific effects of intensive stimulation.

Physicians and therapists should acquaint themselves with the issues in the controversy and the available evidence. Based on past and current analyses, studies, and reports, we must conclude that patterning treatment offers no special merit, that the claims of its advocates are unproven, and that the demands on families are so great that in some cases there may be harm in its use.

我不是会员,无法取得PDF整体资料,这些是游民可得的资料extract.

[ 本帖最后由 我是一根葱 于 2007-7-28 16:55 编辑 ]

education2008

原帖由 小猪的铺子 于 2007-7-28 16:38 发表
我是一根葱 提到未找到楼主所说的权威认定材料。如果楼主能把此权威认定材料以合适的方式公布在这里，比如详细的网址，文件扫描件，背景材料，得到如此结论所采用的方法，采集的数据和实例，等等，用中国家长可 ...

http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;104/5/1149

A statement of reaffirmation for this policy was published on May 1, 2006. POLICY STATEMENT

[size=-1]PEDIATRICS Vol. 104 No. 5 November 1999, pp. 1149-1151
[size=-1]AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS:
The Treatment of Neurologically Impaired Children Using Patterning Committee on Children With Disabilities

[/td][size=+2]  ABSTRACT[/tr][/tr]

[size=-1] Top
Abstract
References This statement reviews patterning as a treatment for children with neurologic impairments. This treatment is based on an outmoded and oversimplified theory of brain development. Current information does not support the claims of proponents that this treatment is efficacious, and its use continues to be unwarranted.
Patterning has been advocated for more than 40 years for treating children with brain damage and other disorders, such as learning disabilities, Down syndrome, cerebral palsy, and autism.1-5 A number of organizations have issued cautionary statements about claims for efficacy of this therapy,6-10 including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in 1968 and 1982.3,11 Media coverage,12 inquiries from parents and public officials, the use of alternative forms of treatment by parents for their children,13 and the existence of a new generation of pediatricians who may be unaware of the programs that involve patterning have prompted the AAP to review the current status of this controversial treatment.
Patterning is a series of exercises designed to improve the "neurologic organization" of a child's neurologic impairments. It requires that these exercises be performed over many hours during the day by several persons who manipulate a child's head and extremities in patterns purporting to simulate prenatal and postnatal movements of nonimpaired children.14 Concern about patterning has been raised because promotional methods have made it difficult for parents to refuse treatment for their children without questioning their motivation and adequacy as parents.3 Moreover, dire health consequences for children are implied if parents do not make arrangements to have their child begin patterning.
Several treatment options are offered, ranging from a home program to an intensive treatment program, which states that each succeeding option "offers greater chance of success." Participation in the intensive treatment program requires completion of 3 of the 5 preceding programs, is by invitation only for the "most capable families," and potentially could deplete substantially a family's financial resources. The regimens prescribed can be so demanding, time-consuming, and inflexible that they may place considerable stress on parents and lead them to neglect other family members.15,16(pp251-252)
Patterning programs use a developmental profile designed by the Institute for the Achievement of Human Potential both to assess a child's neurologic functioning and to document change over time.16(p40)17 However, the validity of using this profile for these domains has not been demonstrated, nor has it been compared with currently accepted methods of measuring a child's development. In addition to making claims that a number of conditions may be improved or cured by patterning, proponents of the program assert that patterning can make healthy children superior in physical and cognitive skills.18-22
The aims of treatment programs include attainment of normality of physical, intellectual, and social growth in children with brain injuries. According to providers of patterning therapy,1 the majority of children treated are claimed to achieve at least 1 of those goals. To our knowledge, however, no new data have been presented to support the use of patterning since the AAP reissued its policy statement in 1982. The lack of supporting evidence for the use of this therapy brings into question once again its effectiveness in neurologically impaired children.

[/td][size=+2]  THE THEORY[/tr][/tr]

Neurologic organization, the principle central to the patterning theory of brain functioning, is an oversimplified concept of hemispheric dominance and the relationship of individual sequential phylogenetic development.1623-25 This theory also states that failure to complete properly any stage of neurologic organization adversely affects all subsequent stages and that the best way to treat a damaged nervous system is "to regress to more primitive modes of function and to practice them."17 According to this theory, the majority of cases of mental retardation, learning problems, and behavior disorders are caused by brain damage or improper neurologic organization, and these problems lie on a single continuum of brain damage, for which the most effective treatments are those advocated by patterning.3,16
Current information does not support these contentions. In particular, the lack of dominance or sidedness probably is not an important factor in the cause of, or the therapy for, these conditions.3,16,17 Several careful reviews of the theory have concluded that it is unsupported, contradicted, or without merit based on scientific study.16,17,23,25 Others have described the hypothesis of neurologic organization to be without merit23 and concluded that the theoretical rationale for the treatment is inconsistent with accepted views of neurologic development.24,27(pp207-235)28(pp207-247)

[/td][size=+2]  STATUS OF CLAIMED THERAPEUTIC RESULTS[/tr][/tr]

Results published on patterning have been inconclusive.29-31 Although reports of improvement in reading ability after treatment have been heralded as support for the theory,32,33 statistical analysis revealed few demonstrable benefits.34,35 Controlled studies of reading skills have shown little or no benefit from treatment.,16(pp333-352)36-38
Some disabled children who purportedly benefited from treatment had been given a misdiagnosis or an unduly pessimistic prognosis. The course of maturation in children with neurologic impairments varies, which leads to unwarranted claims that improvements in their conditions were the result of a specific form of treatment.17,39 Some of the cases publicized involved children with traumatic brain injury or encephalitis, who may make substantial health improvements without special treatment.
A well-controlled investigation40 compared 3 groups of children, all of whom were severely mentally disabled and institutionalized. One group received patterning, a second was treated by motivational techniques, and a third received routine care. Using a wide variety of behavioral measures, the investigators found no significant differences among the 3 groups. On the basis of this study, the investigators found nothing to recommend patterning treatment over routine care.40 They concluded that patterning cannot be considered superior to any other method of treatment for institutionalized mentally disabled children.
Other less well-designed studies41,42 also investigated the effect of patterning therapy on children with a heterogeneous range of disabilities. One showed a significant, but short-term, effect on developmental progress in comparison with that attained by children receiving traditional programs in New Zealand.41 The investigators disclosed that the relative success of the program was linked to the families' desire to take greater responsibility for their children's education. Another investigation demonstrated no significant progress in the development of mentally disabled children who had undergone patterning therapy.42 A review of the use of patterning to arouse children in a coma and for sensory stimulation in brain-injured children and adults also gave no scientific evidence or theoretical rationale for its use.43

[/td][size=+2]  CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION[/tr][/tr]

Pediatricians need to work closely with the families of their patients with neurologic disabilities and ensure that they have access to all standard services available in their communities. After the proper diagnosis is made, physicians should discuss controversial treatments as part of the child's initial management plan. Pediatricians, therefore, need to be acquainted with routine and controversial treatments, schedule ample time for their discussion, and explain to parents the placebo effect and the importance of basing treatment decisions on controlled research trials.
Treatment programs that offer patterning remain unfounded; ie, they are based on oversimplified theories, are claimed to be effective for a variety of unrelated conditions, and are supported by case reports or anecdotal data and not by carefully designed research studies. In most cases, improvement observed in patients undergoing this method of treatment can be accounted for based on growth and development, the intensive practice of certain isolated skills, or the nonspecific effects of intensive stimulation.
Physicians and therapists need to remain aware of the issues in the controversy over this specific treatment and the available evidence. On the basis of past and current analyses, studies, and reports, the AAP concludes that patterning treatment continues to offer no special merit, that the claims of its advocates remain unproved, and that the demands and expectations placed on families are so great that in some cases their financial resources may be depleted substantially and parental and sibling relationships could be stressed.
C[size=-1]OMMITTEE ON C[size=-1]HILDREN W[size=-1]ITH D[size=-1]ISABILITIES, [size=-1]1999[size=-1]-[size=-1]2000
Philip R. Ziring, MD, Chairperson
Dana Brazdziunas, MD
W. Carl Cooley, MD
Theodore A. Kastner, MD
Marian E. Kummer, MD
Lilliam González de Pijem, MD
Richard D. Quint, MD, MPH
Elizabeth S. Ruppert, MD
Adrian D. Sandler, MD
L[size=-1]IAISONS
William C. Anderson
Social Security Administration
Polly Arango
Family Voices
Paul Burgan, MD, PhD
Social Security Administration
Connie Garner, RN, MSN, EdD
US Department of Education
Merle McPherson, MD
Maternal and Child Health Bureau
Linda Michaud, MD
  American Academy of Physical Medical/Rehabilitation
Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp, MD
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
S[size=-1]ECTION L[size=-1]IAISONS
Chris P. Johnson, MEd, MD
Section on Children With Disabilities
Lani S. M. Wheeler, MD
Section on School Health

[/td][size=+2]  FOOTNOTES[/tr][/tr]

The recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.

[/td][size=+2]  ABBREVIATIONS[/tr][/tr]

AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics.

[/td][size=+2]  REFERENCES[/tr][/tr]

[size=-1] Top
Abstract
References

• Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential. Informational Bulletin. Available at: http://www.iahp.org. Accessed August 8, 1999
• Golden GS Nonstandard therapies in the developmental disabilities. Am J Dis Child. 1980; 134:487-491 [Abstract]
• American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Children With Disabilities The Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. Pediatrics. 1982; 70:810-812 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Landman GB. Alternative therapies. In: Levine MD, Carey WB, Crocker AC, eds. Developmental/Behavioral Pediatrics. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1992:754-758
• Nickel RE Controversial therapies in young children with developmental disabilities. Infants and Young Children. 1996; 8:29-40
• American Academy for Cerebral Palsy. Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. Statement of Executive Committee. Rosemont, IL: American Academy for Cerebral Palsy; February 15, 1965
• United Cerebral Palsy Association of Texas. The Doman-Delacato Treatment of Neurologically Handicapped Children [information bulletin, undated]. Austin, TX: United Cerebral Palsy Association of Texas
• Canadian Association for Retarded Children. Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential. Ment Retard. Fall 1965:27-28
• American Academy of Neurology and American Academy of Pediatrics Joint Executive Board Statement. The Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. Neurology. 1967; 17:637 [Free Full Text]
• American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1968; 49:183-186 [Medline]
• American Academy of Pediatrics. Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. AAP Newsletter. June 1, 1968(suppl)
• Sharpe R. Better babies. Wall Street Journal. July 18, 1994;col 1, p 1, sec A
• Spigelblatt L, Laine-Ammara G, Pless IB, Guyver A The use of alternative medicine by children. Pediatrics. 1994; 94:811-814 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Zigler E A plea to end the use of the patterning treatment for retarded children. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1981; 51:388-390 [Medline]
• Freeman RD Controversy over "patterning" as treatment for brain damage in children. JAMA. 1967; 202:385-388 [CrossRef][Medline]
• Cummins RA. The Neurologically Impaired Child: Doman-Delacato Techniques Reappraised. New York, NY: Croom Helm; 1988
• Chapanis NP. The patterning method of therapy: a critique. In: Black P, ed. Brain Dysfunction in Children: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1982:265-280
• Doman G. How to Teach Your Baby to Read: The Gentle Revolution. Garden City Park, NY: Avery Publishing Group; 1994
• Doman GJ. Teach Your Baby Math. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 1979
• Doman G, Doman J. How to Multiply Your Baby's Intelligence. Garden City Park, NY: Avery Publishing Group; 1994
• Doman G, Doman J, Aisen S. How to Give Your Baby Encyclopedic Knowledge. Garden City Park, NY: Avery Publishing Group; 1994
• Doman G, Doman D, Hagy B. How to Teach Your Baby To Be Physically Superb: More Gentle Revolution. New York, NY: Doubleday; 1988
• Robbins MP, Glass GV. The Doman-Delacato rationale: a critical analysis. In: Hellmuth J, ed. Educational Therapy. Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications; 1968
• Cohen HJ, Birch HG, Taft LT Some considerations for evaluating the Doman-Delacato "patterning" method. Pediatrics. 1970; 45:302-314 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Silver LB Controversial therapies. J Child Neurol. 1995; 1:S96-S100
• Zigler E, Seitz V On "an experimental evaluation of sensorimotor patterning": a critique. Am J Ment Defic. 1975; 79:483-492 [Medline]
• Molfese DL, Segalowitz SJ. Brain Lateralization in Children: Developmental Implications. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1988
• Springer SP, Deutsch G. Left Brain, Right Brain. New York: WH Freeman; 1989
• Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential. A Summary of Concepts, Procedures, and Organization. Philadelphia, PA. Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential; 1964
• Doman RJ, Spitz ER, Zucman E, Delacato CH, Doman G Children with severe brain injuries: neurological organization in terms of mobility. JAMA. 1960; 174:257-262
• Freeman RD. An investigation of the Doman-Delacato theory of neuropsychology as it applies to trainable mentally retarded children in public schools. J Pediatr. 1967;71:914-915. Book review
• Delacato CH. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Speech and Reading Problems. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers; 1963
• Delacato CH. Neurological Organization and Reading. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers; 1966
• Neman R, Roos P, McCann RM, Menolascino FJ, Heal LW Experimental evaluation of sensorimotor patterning used with mentally retarded children. Am J Ment Defic. 1975; 79:372 [Medline]
• Money J. Reading disorders in children. In: Brenneman-Kelly Practice of Pediatrics, IV. Hagerstown, MD: Paul B. Hoeber Inc; 1967;chap 14A:1-14
• Robbins MP A study of the validity of Delacato's theory of neurological organization. Except Child. 1966; 32:517-523 [Medline]
• Robbins MP Creeping, laterality and reading. Acad Ther Q. 1966; 1:200-206
• Robbins MP Test of the Doman-Delacato rationale with retarded readers. JAMA. 1967; 202:389-393 [CrossRef][Medline]
• Masland RL Unproven methods of treatment. Pediatrics. 1966; 37:713-714 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Sparrow S, Zigler E Evaluation of a patterning treatment for retarded children. Pediatrics. 1978; 62:137-150 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Bridgman GD, Cushen W, Cooper DM, Williams RJ The evaluation of sensorimotor-patterning and the persistence of belief. Br J Ment Subnormality. 1985; 31:67-79
• MacKay DN, Gollogly J, McDonald G The Doman-Delacato methods, I: the principles of neurological organization. Br J Ment Subnormality. 1986; 32:3-19
• Cummins RA Coma arousal and sensory stimulation: an evaluation of the Doman-Delacato approach. Aust Psychol. 1992; 27:71-77

[ 本帖最后由 education2008 于 2007-7-28 16:53 编辑 ]

我是一根葱

Physicians and therapists need to remain aware of the issues in the controversy over this specific treatment and the available evidence. On the basis of past and current analyses, studies, and reports, the AAP concludes that patterning treatment continues to offer no special merit, that the claims of its advocates remain unproved, and that the demands and expectations placed on families are so great that in some cases their financial resources may be depleted substantially and parental and sibling relationships could be stressed.

先请袋子版主拿她的宝贝翻译我们再校正免得说我们乱翻.

我是一根葱

医师和治疗师需要始终明白关于这种具体治疗方法争论性和可得到的证据的各种课题。根据过去和当前的分析, 研究, 和报告, 美国儿科协会认为, 式样治疗法无法继续提供任何特别的优点, 它所提倡能取得的效果依然未被证实, 这种方法对家庭的要求和期望是如此巨大以至于他们的经济资源来可能在某些情况下被完全耗尽，父母亲及兄弟姐妹关系可能变得紧张。


班门弄斧，请大家看对否？

[ 本帖最后由 我是一根葱 于 2007-7-28 17:22 编辑 ]

海阔凭鱼跃

本楼这样的争论有意思

基本属于“忽悠和反忽悠”之战