edu是不是你说的"爬多了有好处"要打个问号?

linkspeed

非常学术的. 不但是英文的, 而且是2005年出版的, 并且还有文献索引. 你一定喜欢.

From: MONTESSORI, The science behind the genius
2005, Oxford
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Impact of Crawling

The onset of crawling has also been linked to a broad array of advances in both the physical and the social domains. These advances include perception of distance, perception of one's own body motion, representation of spatial layout, ability to refer to objects by pointing, and other social and emotional developments (Campos et al., 2000).

One example of the developmental advances that come with self-locomotion in humans is seen in a study of infants' ability to find hidden objects. Infants, some of whom were already moving themselves (crawling or cruising along on two legs while holding something) and others of whom were not yet moving on their own watched from a distance as an experimenter hid a toy under one of two colored Cups. Infants were then carried to the hiding place. Even though all infants were of the same age (7 to 11 months), those infants who had been moving on their own the longest were significantly more likely to find the hidden object than were infants with less or no locomotor experience (Bai & Bertenthal,1992). This suggests that the onset of self-locomotion is related to developmental advances in the representation of self and space.

Self-generated locomotion also is linked to depth perception in human babies, echoing the Held and Hein finding with kittens described earlier. Wariness of heights develops when infants begin to move on their own (Campos et al., 200o). Infants who are not yet crawling are less likely to show a fear response - an increased heart rate - when lowered in a harness over a "visual cliff," a set-up that looks like a steep drop-off, than are infants of the same age who already crawl. This holds true even if a child's experience with self-generated movement is induced artificially, by having them use a walker.'

As with grasping, developments accruing with the onset of self-locomotion extend to the social realm as well. Asocial advance that appears to be related to self-locomotion is following a person's gaze. Following someone's gaze indicates at least rudimentary sensitivity to others' mental lives and thus is an important milestone in social cognition. Some studies of self-locomotion and gaze following occurred in China (Tao & Dong,1997, described in Campos et al., 2000). At least at the time of this study, urban Chinese infants spent much of their awake time propped in a sitting position on a very soft bed, surrounded by thick pillows to prevent falling. Their parents discouraged crawling to prevent dirty hands, and the infants crawled late relative to suburban Chinese infants who were more often permitted to crawl. When tested in a gaze-following procedure, suburban Chinese infants followed about 75% of gazes, whereas urban ones followed only about 50%. Other studies in both the United States and China have shown that even among crawlers, a child's tendency to follow a gaze is significantly related to the length of time the child has been crawling (Campos rl al., 2ooo). Self-produced locomotion thus appears to open the door to sharing others' mental experiences.

sally-zhang111

莫名其妙，吵了半天，怎么一点都跟主题无关

woodgarden

linkspeed+-->引用:linkspeed
老观点，孩子是个空白，然后得出他必须被动的吸收。这是整个学校教育的设计基本原则。
你需要更新知识了。他当然知道他喜不喜欢，讨不讨厌，需不需要。不要他就不看了。

谁说观点越新就越正确？早期教育等同于学校教育吗？婴儿还什么都没见过，你给他看的闪卡很有可能被他误认为是必需的。

linkspeed

我可没有讽刺挖苦，你是需要仔细的学学人家怎么批判的。

你们这样批判的人不太会看人家的文字，只会不停的打反问号，炒冷饭。
Edu现在已经沦落到这个地步了。

>可强迫一个连头还不会转动的婴儿看卡片算什么？他喜欢吗？他需要吗？他还什么都不知道！
>他只能象海绵吸水一样吸收一切看到和听到的东西。

老观点，孩子是个空白，然后得出他必须被动的吸收。这是整个学校教育的设计基本原则。
你需要更新知识了。他当然知道他喜不喜欢，讨不讨厌，需不需要。不要他就不看了。

>关键问题还不是你让他那小小的房间里装满了“无用的废物”（对婴儿来说），你还企图让他的
>大脑通过训练永远停留在婴儿期的活动模式（右脑照像），这不是太虚妄了吗？

你还不如说我让我得孩子变成脑瘫了，永远长不大了。

woodgarden

linkspeed+-->引用:linkspeed 作者: linkspeed
所以这说明机械记忆对婴幼儿来讲, 是灰常灰常重要的. 机械记忆的对象包括实物,生活,卡片,电视,语言印刷的文字,动作等等任何东西. 不要1听机械记忆就反感. 1听条件反射就呕吐, 没有这些, 宝宝基本上就是个白痴.
至于机械记忆是否可以通过训练强化而且保留, 10年以后我再回答你吧. 到时候你就只有听的份了.

我的那段话是对你以上论点而发的。希望你能弄清我说话的主旨，不要断章取义地进行曲解，光是讽刺挖苦也不能让大家明白你的观点。

linkspeed

>你还企图让他的大脑通过训练永远停留在婴儿期的活动模式（右脑照像），这不是太虚妄了吗？

哦， 我建议你学习一片文章: 论孔丘的反动一生。看看人家是如何引证和批判的。

woodgarden

linkspeed+-->引用:linkspeed
没人硬灌。对知识而言，婴儿喜欢就是需要，他不喜欢就是不需要。

我读了6年小学，6年中学，4年大学，硬灌给我的不需要的知识才多呢，16年的政治课就是1个大大的浪费。
充满了谎言。我连选择都没有。我叫谁去对生命、对自然有一点敬畏、有一点尊重。

我的孩子现在有充分的选择自由，她不爱看我绝不逼她，她爱看啥看啥。

linkspeed

》盲目给婴儿灌输那些杂七杂八的他根本不需要的知识，

没人硬灌。对知识而言，婴儿喜欢就是需要，他不喜欢就是不需要。

我读了6年小学，6年中学，4年大学，硬灌给我的不需要的知识才多呢，16年的政治课就是1个大大的浪费。
充满了谎言。我连选择都没有。我叫谁去对生命、对自然有一点敬畏、有一点尊重。

我的孩子现在有充分的选择自由，她不爱看我绝不逼她，她爱看啥看啥。

linkspeed

>你记得再多, 有图书馆多吗? 有互联网多吗?

唉，那东西是死的，用的是人。

你觉得善于查互联网的人和不善于查的人区别在什么地方？是逻辑推理么？

基本知识不丰富的人，该从哪里开始查都不知道。

woodgarden