What Kinds of Phonemic Awareness Instruction Are Best?
Studies of phonemic awareness worked with children who were organized in several different configurations: individual tutoring, small-group,and large-group instruction. Because many of the studies of older, struggling readers---the group that benefited least from this teaching---provided the instruction through tutoring, it is difficult to accurately estimate the effects of one-on-one teaching of phonemic awareness.
音素意识研究报告中的孩子被安排在三种不同的教学配置:个别辅导、小组教学、大组教学。因为很多对年龄大些的,有阅读困难者的(即在这种教学中获益最少的人群)研究提供了个别辅导的训练, 所以很难精确地估计一对一进行音素意识教学的效果。
In the studies of younger children,phonemic awareness teaching was delivered to whole classes or small groups,and the effectiveness of these variables can be compared.Small group teaching led to greater learning than was evident with large group teaching.This is not surprising as small-group instruction allows the teacher to receive more of the children’s attention,children can better see the teacher’s mouth as the words are being spoken--- an important perceptual cue to phonemic awareness (Massaro,1997),and the children have more opportunities to respond to and receive feedback from the teacher in the small-group setting.
在年纪较小孩子的研究报告中,音素意识教学是在整个课堂或小组中进行,这些变量的有效性可以比较。小组教学很明显比大组教学有更大的学习效果。这一点都不令人意外,因为小组教学可以让老师获得更多孩子的注意力,孩子看可以更好地看到老师说单词时的口型--- 一个重要的音素意识的感知性提示,在小组教学环境中, 孩子们有更多的机会可以作出反应和接收到老师的反馈。
Small groups,although more effective,require more teaching time.Even if a teacher had only 15 children in a class,groups of three would require five times the amount of instruction that a whole-class lesson would. For this reason,phonemic awareness should be taught using a combination of whole-class and small-group teaching.Lessons might be taught first to the whole class,with more intensive small-group follow-up for those who fail to progress adequately from the whole-class instruction alone.This approach reflects the research findings and balances the efficiencies of whole-class teaching with the learning needs of individual children. The studies showed that simple instruction was better than complex instruction. Again, this should not be surprising, since the test subjects were kindergarten and first-grade children. Instructional efforts that focused on one or two phonemic awareness skills had greater impacts on learning than those that addressed several skills simultaneously. Table 1 (see Appendix A,p.40) shows some of the skills that might be taught in a phonemic awareness program.
虽然小组教学更有效,但小组教学需要更多的教学时间。即使一个老师一个班只有15个孩子,分三个小组教学需要比整个班一起教学5倍的时间。由于这个原因,音素意识教学应该整班教学和小组教学相结合。首先可以整班上课,后续对那些只上整班课不能有足够进步的孩子进行小组加强。这种方法反映了研究结果,平衡了整班教学和孩子个别需要教学的效率。研究显示,简单训练比复杂训练要好。这个也不令人意外,因为测试对象是幼儿园和一年级的孩子。集中一个或两个音素认知技能的训练比那些同时处理多种技能的训练对学习有更大的影响力。
表1(附录A)列出了 在音素意识课程中可以教的一些技能。
|