杜曼 闪卡是伪科学？

litleants

原文照登，本人现在不发表意见，现在自己也在调研。

原文网址：http://teachers.net/mentors/bcl/topic507/6.29.05.06.24.34.html
Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Caution!

翻译：杜曼 闪卡是伪科学

[size=+1]Post: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Caution! Posted by LL on 6/29/05

What I see is very sad... I see so many people here who are looking, rightfully so,
for solutions to children's learning and developmental
needs. What I am deeply saddened by, is the unfortunate
nature by which loving parents and teachers are lead
toward unresearched, unfounded, and in the case of Doman-
Delacato Repatterning techniques--treatments which have
been well-researched and found to have been entirely
ineffective! I don't mean to be a "downer" here, but I feel that my
extensive research background has a purpose here. I want
to continue to educate those who have not looked, or not
found, the research behind the techniques they are
interested in using. Please review the following items. They are a small
sampling of the multiple research articles out there that
strongly indicate Doman's techniques are not supported in
the literature. Psychomotor Repatterning--Pseudoscience:
http://www.theness.com/articles/patterning-cs0104.html Neurophysiological Approaches (A Critique)
http://207.44.158.59/~admin2/dyslexia/index/articles/displa
y/69 Position Statement regarding repatterning: American
Academy of Pediatrics
http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pedia
trics;104/5/1149 Position Statement on Doman-Delacato Treatment:
National Downs Syndrome Congress
http://members.carol.net/~ndsc/doman.html Procedures to Avoid:
http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/mentserv.
html National Council Against Health Fraud:
http://www.ncahf.org/nl/2001/7-8.html Hines, T. M. (2001). The Doman-Delacato patterning
treatment for brain damage. The Scientific Review of
Alternative Medicine, 5, 80-89.
Abstract:
Hines critically reviews the theoretical and empirical
bases of "patterning" therapy, a treatment for brain
damage that involves a series of bodily exercises that are
intended to "rewire" the brain. Hines observes that
patterning advocates posit models of brain development and
organization that are grossly erroneous. Moreover, he
finds that the research evidence supporting the efficacy
of patterning is weak, methodological flawed, or both. In
one ostensibly supportive study, for example, the
investigators conducted 276 separate statistical tests and
found that only 8.2% of the findings attained statistical
significance at the p < .05 level. Moreover, because many
of the dependent measures were highly intercorrelated,
this overall result may actually represent worse than
chance effects for patterning. These are just a few summaries of the research that has
extensively demonstrated a lack of connection between the
Doman (i.e., Doman-Delacato) methods and improvement in
children's functioning. The scholarly research that has been done is
comprehensive. Check out your local university library or
www.scholar.google.com for more information as I cannot
post the articles directly here due to copyright.

Psychomotor Patterning--Pseudoscience

Posts on this thread, including this one
Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Caution!, 6/29/05, by LL. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 7/03/05, by Robin Burn. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 7/03/05, by ll. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 7/07/05, by helen. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 7/07/05, by LL. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 9/28/05, by Shaedae. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 10/29/05, by Anne. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 11/02/05, by anon. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 12/30/05, by Amy. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 1/19/06, by Danny Murray. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 1/19/06, by Danny Murray. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 3/27/06, by Kim U. Re: Doman / Delacato / Repatterning is Pseudoscience! Cautio, 3/01/07, by Robin Burn.

zhx6662999

不信就不闪好了，这里的爸妈都是相信的。

吉娃娃baby2009

其实多了解一些是没有错误的！谁不是为了孩子好.

karenhui

试试也无妨呀，不一定要先买他家的产品，也可以自制的呀，何况也不是每个小朋友都适合这种教学方式 的~

coco5700

现在早教的方法太多了，不一定哪种适合自家宝宝，不能因为这种宝宝不接受就否认这种方法。多试试总是好的。本人觉得。

vicky100

我也觉得试试无妨。
每个孩子都有自己的个性，培养方式也肯定不一样的。

ziluolan

英文看不懂！试试也无妨，只要孩子不厌烦

vivianw

美国小儿科协会的报告，应该不是儿戏吧。或许该看看。

joyfringe

我见过Doman, 也见过孩子们怎样学习。任何的知识，如果开始和主流社会的信仰相违背或者抵触，就会被认为是伪科学，一棒子打死。可惜新生事物总要发展，尤其是他们有自己肯定的一面，所以这些一位叫嚣伪科学要打死新生事物的力量最终都要推出历史舞台。Doman本人觉无私心，胸怀宽广，热爱人类，我从没有见到像他那样作出那么大的成绩却还不狂妄自大的人。相比之下，我在海外也见多少数作出点成绩的中国人，可惜鼻子都长在脑门上了。

joyfringe

我见过Doman, 也见过孩子们怎样学习。任何的知识，如果开始和主流社会的信仰相违背或者抵触，就会被认为是伪科学，一棒子打死。可惜新生事物总要发展，尤其是他们有自己肯定的一面，所以这些一位叫嚣伪科学要打死新生事物的力量最终都要退出历史舞台。Doman本人绝无私心，胸怀宽广，热爱人类，我从没有见到像他那样作出那么大的成绩却还不狂妄自大的人。相比之下，我在海外也见多少数作出点成绩的中国人，可惜鼻子都长在脑门上了