答:
Hi Laura:
I'm glad that you're asking these questions. That's the best way to learn. Let's see if I can help with these.
From your questions, it would appear that you're looking for rules that are going to help you reliably PREDICT spelling. While the rules in SWR can help EXPLAIN English spelling, they cannot always predict it. Why does one word spell the /s/ sound with C whereas another spells it with S? Why can the sound /O/ be spelled in different words with O, OA, EAU, OUGH, among others? English is made up of numerous language influences, and it will, therefore, have different kinds of spellings depending on its trail through history and languages. Studying the word’s etymology often sheds light on the reasons for particular spellings. It can quickly get frustrating to find patterns in simple words (such as words ending with -as) and assume that those patterns will stand up to the language as a whole, only to find that it just isn't so. That's one of the reasons we don't want to teach faulty phonics (see SWR Appendix A), because it sets the student up to have erroneous assumptions about the language.
Some of SWR’s rules will help us predict when to use one phonogram over another. For example, Rule #6 alerts us as to why we would need to use OY at the end of a word instead of OI when we hear this sound. Rule #20 tells me that it’s perfectly understandable that there would be a C after the X in “except” because I cannot use S immediately after X.
However, we have to be very careful that we’re really thinking about these rules and what they’re telling us--and ONLY what they’re telling us. Remember, we’re not just teaching spelling and reading, but we’re teaching our students how to think and to use logic. Let me give you two examples.
I just reviewed Rule #27 with my younger students today. We learned that if we hear the /z/ sound at the beginning of a base word, it cannot be spelled with S. They were quite pleased with themselves when I asked them to tell me which phonogram they had to use to spell the first sound in the word “zoo,” an easy word in a beginning list. But let’s look at the rule closer to see how it applies to the language as a whole.
Rule #27 says, “Z, never S, spells /z/ at the beginning of a base word.” What is that rule telling us? It simply means that the S cannot say its second sound when it is at the beginning of a base word. Does that rule tell us that Z is the ONLY letter we could use to spell the /z/ sound at the beginning of a base word? What about the word “xylophone?” In this word, the X is saying an advanced phonogram sound /z/, and it’s at the beginning of a base word. Did that word violate Rule #27? That would be the case only if the rule had said, “Z is the only letter that can ever be used to spell /z/ at the beginning of a base word.” In actuality, the focus of Rule #27 is to rule out S as a possibility in this situation, not to restrict that situation to using Z and Z alone.
Here’s another common example. Rule #25 says, “CK is only used after a single vowel which says /a-e-i-o-u/ (back, peck, pick, pocket, truck).” Many people interpret this to mean that when I am saying /k/ after a single, short vowel, I will use CK. That works for the words listed as examples and many other beginning level words. Unfortunately, that assumption doesn’t hold true for the rest of the language. (Notice I said “assumption” not “rule.”) What about the words “music,” “stomach,” or “liquor?” Each of these words don’t spell the /k/ sound with CK, even though they fit the pattern of Rule #25. Is this a violation of the rule? No, because the rule never said you cannot use another spelling of /k/ in these situations; it merely identified where CK would be used. See what I mean? When we try to apply the rules to mean something they don’t, we get frustrated thinking they’re not working or they’re not explaining the language. Frustration ensues because we made assumptions that weren’t true. The problem lies with our assumptions, not the language.
All this to say,
• You cannot put the English language in a nice, neat box and predict all spelling words. You could, on the other hand, predict the spelling of controlled vocabulary readers which only have words that follow the rules (often erroneous) that have been taught, but which do not give a more global exposure to the language. The result is an inaccurate understanding of how the language works and a conclusion that English is inconsistent and inexplicable.
• You have to dig into the language to learn it. There will be nuances to some vocabulary words and spelling patterns that are unusual. When you work your way through the Wise List, you’re not just teaching those specific 2,000 words. You are teaching a core set of words that illustrate the spelling patterns of an entire language that currently has over 1 million words in it. (Isn’t it nice to know you don’t have to teach all 1 million words?) Instead, you teach your students the core components of that language (70 phonograms and 28 simple, reliable rules), maximize their brain capacity to learn and apply this information to that huge language (multi-sensory learning with meaningful repetition and review), and then teach them the spelling patterns for the entire language (the Wise List). Sounds pretty impressive, eh?
• Yes, memorization is required. You nailed it in your question. For example, I taught the words “exhort” and “answer” from List P-6 today. Both of these words have silent letters that are no longer spoken but have retained them in the spelling. For us in 2014, they’re just plain, weird words. So how do we teach them? We analyze them for the rules and phonograms that are in use. We use the “think to spell” tool for remembering those lost sounds. But in the end, the kids have to remember to use the silent H and W to spell those words correctly. To help that happen, I will review those words in meaningful language contexts throughout the week, having the kids practice the “think to spell” several times, having them say the words while they write them, and in the end, they’ll remember.
|